Can I ask you to read Revelation with me, and with your comments, so I can learn?
Two things arrive together this morning. This is the hundredth entry of this journal — and the first one written outside Portugal. The feed places the Benimar at Aldeaseca de Armuña, near Salamanca. The border is behind them.
On the fifteenth of August Le wrote a sentence about the future: we are leaving Portugal, but God is going to stay with us, wherever we go. This morning it stopped being about the future.
And on the hundredth morning she asks to begin a book — the one most Christians avoid. Which is fitting, because it is the only book in the Bible that pronounces a blessing on the person who reads it.
Le has asked for commentary as we go, so this should be said at the outset. Revelation is the book where confident interpreters have most often been wrong. Every generation has produced readers who identified the beast, fixed the date, and were mistaken.
So here is what will be offered in these entries and what will not. What the text says. What the words meant to the people who first heard them. What the Old Testament passages behind the images are — because Revelation is stitched together out of Daniel, Ezekiel, Zechariah and Exodus almost line by line. And where faithful readers genuinely differ, that will be said rather than hidden.
What will not be offered is a timetable. Where I do not know, I will say so. The blessing in verse 3 is promised to those who read, hear and keep — not to those who decode.
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants — things which must shortly take place. And He sent and signified it by His angel to His servant John."
"Révélation de Jésus-Christ, que Dieu lui a donnée pour montrer à ses serviteurs les choses qui doivent arriver bientôt, et qu'il a fait connaître, par l'envoi de son ange, à son serviteur Jean."
Apocalypse 1:1 · Louis Segond 1910The first thing to notice is the title, because the book names itself in its opening words — and the name it gives is not the one on most covers.
Not the Revelation of St John. The Revelation of Jesus Christ. Révélation de Jésus-Christ.
The Greek word is apokalypsis — an uncovering, an unveiling. It is what you do when you pull a cloth off something that was already there. The word does not mean catastrophe, despite what English has made of it. It means the removal of a covering.
And the grammar allows two readings that are both true of this book: the unveiling that comes from Jesus, and the unveiling of Jesus. He is both the One speaking and the One shown.
Which is worth fixing in the mind before chapter one is finished. Whatever else the book contains, it announces itself as a book about Him.
Verse 1 lays out a chain of transmission, explicitly, and it has five links.
God gave it → to Jesus Christ → who showed it → sent by His angel → to His servant John → to be shown to His servants.
The first link is the surprising one. Which God gave Him. Even the Son receives it. He does not originate it. That fits what He said in the Gospels — of that day and hour no one knows, not even the Son, but the Father.
And note the last link. The chain does not end with John. It was given to show His servants — plural, ordinary, unnamed. The book was not written for scholars. It was addressed to seven congregations of working people, most of them in trouble.
Now the most useful word in the verse, and the one English usually buries. He sent and signified it.
The Greek is esēmanen — from sēmeion, a sign. It means to make known by signs. The Segond renders it il a fait connaître, which is accurate but gentler.
This is a label at the top of the book telling you what kind of book it is. Before a single vision appears, the reader is told that what follows is communicated in signs.
Which saves a great deal of trouble later. When a lamb appears with seven horns and seven eyes, the text has already said it is speaking in signs. Nobody is being asked to picture a deformed animal. The seven horns mean complete power; the seven eyes, complete sight. The sign points past itself.
And a sign is not less true than a photograph. A wedding ring is a sign, and there is nothing unreal about a marriage.
Things which must shortly take place. Les choses qui doivent arriver bientôt.
This phrase has troubled readers for nineteen centuries, and it should be handled honestly. The Greek is en tachei, and it carries two possible senses. It can mean soon — before long. Or it can mean quickly — with speed, once begun.
Faithful readers have taken it both ways, and this journal will not pretend the question is settled. What can be said is this: the book was written to people who needed to know that God had not lost control of their situation — and both readings say the same thing to them. Either it is near, or when it comes it will not be slow.
And Peter gives the pastoral answer elsewhere, without resolving the grammar: the Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us. What looks like delay is described as patience.
"...who bore witness to the word of God, and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, to all things that he saw."
"lequel a attesté la parole de Dieu et le témoignage de Jésus-Christ, tout ce qu'il a vu."
Apocalypse 1:2 · Louis Segond 1910Yesterday Le asked what commended means in Hebrews 11, and the answer was martyreō — to bear witness, to testify. Courtroom language.
And here it is again, on the first page of Revelation. John bore witness — the same verb. Il a attesté. And the noun follows in the same line: the testimony of Jesus Christ. Le témoignage de Jésus-Christ.
She learned the word on Tuesday and it is doing structural work on Wednesday. Nobody arranged that.
And it sets John's role precisely. He is not the author of what follows; he is a witness to it. To all things that he saw. A witness testifies to what he did not invent and cannot alter. His whole competence is that he was there.
"Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near."
"Heureux celui qui lit et ceux qui entendent les paroles de la prophétie, et qui gardent les choses qui y sont écrites! Car le temps est proche."
Apocalypse 1:3 · Louis Segond 1910Read the singulars and plurals carefully, because they describe a room. Blessed is HE who reads — singular — and THOSE who hear — plural.
One reader. Many listeners. That is not a figure of speech. Scrolls were expensive and most people could not read. A letter arrived at a congregation and one person stood up and read it aloud while everyone else listened.
So the blessing was written for a room, not a study. Which is a small vindication of something that happened in this journal a week ago: Le asked for the French Scriptures to be spoken aloud, so she could hear them. That is the older way of receiving this book, not the newer one.
And the French word is warmer than blessed. Heureux — happy. Not merely approved. Well off. To be envied.
The blessing has three conditions, not two. Read. Hear. Keep. Lit... entendent... gardent.
The third verb is the one that closes every escape route. A person can read Revelation as a puzzle and hear it as theatre — and the blessing is attached to neither. Keep means guard, observe, hold onto, do.
Which means Revelation is not primarily a book of information about the future. It is a book of instruction for the present. Nobody can keep a timetable. You can only keep a command.
Jowett said it in July, and it is the same principle: the only way to eat a message is to obey it. And this journal has spent a month on the difference between reading to extract and reading to receive. Verse 3 puts that distinction at the door of the book.
One last thing worth knowing on a first morning. This is the only book in the Bible that pronounces a blessing on the person who reads it.
And it is the book most Christians skip. Which is a strange arrangement: the one that comes with a promise attached is the one people are most afraid of.
The blessing in verse 3 is the first of seven in Revelation — the last of them near the very end of the book. Seven blessings, in a book people associate with terror.
Car le temps est proche. The word for time here is not clock-time but the appointed moment — the right season, the hour something is due. Not there is little time left, so much as the moment is at hand.
Apocalipse — the removal of the covering.
That is why I must read it and quit avoiding it. Ask the Holy Spirit to understand the signs and the imagery of God.
Too many people writing about it for their own profit.
Le names a real danger, and Scripture has a very sharp word for it.
2 Corinthians 2:17 — "we are not, as so many, peddling the word of God." The Greek is kapēleuō, the word for a tavern-keeper who waters the wine before selling it. Paul's charge is not merely that such men profit. It is that the product is diluted to increase the margin.
And Revelation attracts that trade more than any other book — because fear sells, and certainty sells, and this book can be made to supply both. Every generation has produced confident charts, fixed dates, and named beasts, and every generation's charts have had to be quietly withdrawn.
Which means the test Le has just named applies to these entries as well, and she should apply it. Where the text is genuinely disputed, that will be said rather than smoothed over. Where the answer is unknown, it will be called unknown. If these notes ever begin announcing what will happen next Tuesday, they should be stopped.
You can recognise a wine-waterer by whether he leaves you needing him.
Le's method is the right one, and Jesus promised it in the same book's own idiom: "When He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth."
And John himself wrote something stronger in his letter: the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that anyone should teach you.
One honest caution about that verse, because it is often misused. It does not abolish teachers — Paul says plainly that God gave them to the church, and John was teaching while he wrote that sentence. What it means is that no teacher can substitute for the Spirit's own witness inside a person.
So the two work together, and the order matters. The teaching supplies material. The Spirit decides what gets in. Which is exactly how these mornings have run for a hundred days: Le reads first, alone; the notes come second; and what lodges is not up to either of us.
Her own sentence from the fourteenth of August is the rule for reading this book too. You learn to receive the Word, not to manipulate it.
"That is why I must read it and quit avoiding it. Ask the Holy Spirit to understand the signs and the imagery of God."
Le's Heart · Aldeaseca de Armuña, España · Day one hundred · Apocalypse 1:1–3An Unveiling, of Jesus
Apokalypsis means pulling a cloth off something already there — not catastrophe. And the book names itself: not the Revelation of John, but of Jesus Christ.
Five Links
God gave it, Jesus showed it, an angel carried it, John received it, the servants get it. Even the Son receives rather than originates. And the chain does not end with John.
Signified
Esēmanen — made known by signs. A reading instruction printed before the first vision. When the Lamb has seven horns, the text already told you it speaks in signs.
Read, Hear, Keep
One reads aloud; many listen. And the third verb closes the escape routes — nobody can keep a timetable. You can only keep a command.